Imagine
we could design a scent Rorschach (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_test)
test to give to our dogs.
One dog would see one image and another dog
might see the same or the negative image in the test. Sometimes when watching a
dog work I see the dog searching all the negative space, the void in-between
objects. Yes they encounter corners, edges, stumble over containers and even
run into objects, but not always. It’s beautiful to watch the dog moves in this
negative dimension from what we can’t see or different from what we initially
see. It can be frustrating to the handler when the dog appears to not making
progress, i.e. the source is not in the negative space of that image. In fact just
this past weekend I watch several handlers call alert and then say were the
source was located. It was like they watched the voids and objects the dog evaluated
and where able to see what was coming next – the dog would have turned and
sourced and therefore knew where the source was.
There
was a test as a kid I took once at the optometrist, that tested for dyslexia. It
was cube of sorts with several layers of letters, you looked into it and there
was a paragraph to read out load. Not sure if I can fully describe its design
but if the patient moved then the letters would shift. The optometrist said at
the end, that most adults performing the test would give up because it doesn’t
make sense what they are reading. But as a kid with dyslexia I just read to the
end squirming in my seat and making absolutely no darn sense. What if every
time the dog moves while working, that negative space/image of scent they are
encountering is altered, either by the handler, dog or some other environmental
factors? Imagine the intense work and focus the dog must be under in the moment
with so many computations to make.
The
Rorschach image or ink blots have a unique property, called reflection symmetry
or mirror-image symmetry which happens in nature, and can be described in
mathematical terms. I often suggest in my classes with the possibility that the
dogs are really doing differential calculus problems to solve a scent problem. Each
term of the equation as it is solved by the dog reduces the remaining
information or terms required to complete the scent problem and source.
Back
to Ron; he encourages us to watch the dog work, to do our best not to interfere,
move/not move but use them as our guide in the world of scent because the dog
is the expert. It appears to be “magic” sometimes but in a way we are lucky
when we see something that can not be seen it can only be observed in how our
dogs work the scent problem in that particular environment and search. It can
not be repeated later, it only happens once. Or if we observe carefully it happens
similarly enough with another dog that is gives us a glimpse into their world
of scent. We also encounter experienced handlers, judges, trainers with new
observations about the dog’s patterns that we may not have fully understood what
we were seeing at the time. Do all of these apply to every dog, maybe not, but it’s
these observations that help us understand the vast unseen capabilities of
dogs.
My
dogs do calculus and I do addition and subtraction, I think the problems they
are solving are beautiful to watch.